B18-Core EXAFS
|
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[30958]
Open Access
Abstract: The heterogeneous solid–gas reactions of crystals of [Rh(L2)(propene)][BArF4] (1, L2 = tBu2PCH2CH2PtBu2) with H2 and propene, 1-butene, propyne, or 1-butyne are explored by gas-phase nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy under batch conditions at 25 °C. The temporal evolution of the resulting parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) effects measures catalytic flux and thus interrogates the efficiency of catalytic pairwise para-H2 transfer, speciation changes in the crystalline catalyst at the molecular level, and allows for high-quality single-scan 1H, 13C NMR gas-phase spectra for the products to be obtained, as well as 2D-measurements. Complex 1 reacts with H2 to form dimeric [Rh(L2)(H)(μ-H)]2[BArF4]2 (4), as probed using EXAFS; meanwhile, a single-crystal of 1 equilibrates NMR silent para-H2 with its NMR active ortho isomer, contemporaneously converting into 4, and 1 and 4 each convert para-H2 into ortho-H2 at different rates. Hydrogenation of propene using 1 and para-H2 results in very high initial polarization levels in propane (>85%). Strong PHIP was also detected in the hydrogenation products of 1-butene, propyne, and 1-butyne. With propyne, a competing cyclotrimerization deactivation process occurs to afford [Rh(tBu2PCH2CH2PtBu2)(1,3,4-Me3C6H3)][BArF4], while with 1-butyne, rapid isomerization of 1-butyne occurs to give a butadiene complex, which then reacts with H2 more slowly to form catalytically active 4. Surprisingly, the high PHIP hydrogenation efficiencies allow hyperpolarization effects to be seen when H2 is taken directly from a regular cylinder at 25 °C. Finally, changing the chelating phosphine to Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2 results in initial high polarization efficiencies for propene hydrogenation, but rapid quenching of the catalyst competes to form the zwitterion [Rh(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2){η6-(CF3)2(C6H3)}BArF3].
|
Jan 2023
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[25315]
Open Access
Abstract: The reactivity of the Ir(I) PONOP pincer complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-propene)][BArF4], 6, [iPr-PONOP = 2,6-(iPr2PO)2C6H3N, ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3] was studied in solution and the solid state, both experimentally, using molecular density functional theory (DFT) and periodic-DFT computational methods, as well as in situ single-crystal to single-crystal (SC-SC) techniques. Complex 6 is synthesized in solution from sequential addition of H2 and propene, and then the application of vacuum, to [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-COD)][BArF4], 1, a reaction manifold that proceeds via the Ir(III) dihydrogen/dihydride complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(H2)H2][BArF4], 2, and the Ir(III) dihydride propene complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-propene)H2][BArF4], 7, respectively. In solution (CD2Cl2) 6 undergoes rapid reaction with H2 to form dihydride 7 and then a slow (3 d) onward reaction to give dihydrogen/dihydride 2 and propane. DFT calculations on the molecular cation in solution support this slow, but productive, reaction, with a calculated barrier to rate-limiting propene migratory insertion of 24.8 kcal/mol. In the solid state single-crystals of 6 also form complex 7 on addition of H2 in an SC-SC reaction, but unlike in solution the onward reaction (i.e., insertion) does not occur, as confirmed by labeling studies using D2. The solid-state structure of 7 reveals that, on addition of H2 to 6, the PONOP ligand moves by 90° within a cavity of [BArF4]− anions rather than the alkene moving. Periodic DFT calculations support the higher barrier to insertion in the solid state (ΔG‡ = 26.0 kcal/mol), demonstrating that the single-crystal environment gates onward reactivity compared to solution. H2 addition to 6 to form 7 is reversible in both solution and the solid state, but in the latter crystallinity is lost. A rare example of a sigma amine-borane pincer complex, [Ir(iPr-PONOP)H2(η1-H3B·NMe3)][BArF4], 5, is also reported as part of these studies.
|
Jul 2022
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Open Access
Abstract: The sequential solid/gas single-crystal to single-crystal reaction of [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)3PCy2)(COD)][BArF4] (COD = cyclooctadiene) with H2 or D2 was followed in situ by solid-state 31P{1H} NMR spectroscopy (SSNMR) and ex situ by solution quenching and GC-MS. This was quantified using a two-step Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kologoromov (JMAK) model that revealed an inverse isotope effect for the second addition of H2, that forms a σ-alkane complex [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)3PCy2)(COA)][BArF4]. Using D2, a temporal window is determined in which a structural solution for this σ-alkane complex is possible, which reveals an η2,η2-binding mode to the Rh(I) center, as supported by periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Extensive H/D exchange occurs during the addition of D2, as promoted by the solid-state microenvironment.
|
Jan 2022
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Alexander J.
Bukvic
,
Arron L.
Burnage
,
Graham J.
Tizzard
,
Antonio J.
Martinez-Martinez
,
Alasdair I.
Mckay
,
Nicholas H.
Rees
,
Bengt E.
Tegner
,
Tobias
Krämer
,
Heather
Fish
,
Mark R.
Warren
,
Simon J.
Coles
,
Stuart A.
Macgregor
,
Andrew S.
Weller
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[20300, 17308]
Open Access
Abstract: Using solid-state molecular organometallic (SMOM) techniques, in particular solid/gas single-crystal to single-crystal reactivity, a series of σ-alkane complexes of the general formula [Rh(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2)(ηn:ηm-alkane)][BArF4] have been prepared (alkane = propane, 2-methylbutane, hexane, 3-methylpentane; ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3). These new complexes have been characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR spectroscopy and DFT computational techniques and present a variety of Rh(I)···H–C binding motifs at the metal coordination site: 1,2-η2:η2 (2-methylbutane), 1,3-η2:η2 (propane), 2,4-η2:η2 (hexane), and 1,4-η1:η2 (3-methylpentane). For the linear alkanes propane and hexane, some additional Rh(I)···H–C interactions with the geminal C–H bonds are also evident. The stability of these complexes with respect to alkane loss in the solid state varies with the identity of the alkane: from propane that decomposes rapidly at 295 K to 2-methylbutane that is stable and instead undergoes an acceptorless dehydrogenation to form a bound alkene complex. In each case the alkane sits in a binding pocket defined by the {Rh(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2)}+ fragment and the surrounding array of [BArF4]− anions. For the propane complex, a small alkane binding energy, driven in part by a lack of stabilizing short contacts with the surrounding anions, correlates with the fleeting stability of this species. 2-Methylbutane forms more short contacts within the binding pocket, and as a result the complex is considerably more stable. However, the complex of the larger 3-methylpentane ligand shows lower stability. Empirically, there therefore appears to be an optimal fit between the size and shape of the alkane and overall stability. Such observations are related to guest/host interactions in solution supramolecular chemistry and the holistic role of 1°, 2°, and 3° environments in metalloenzymes.
|
Mar 2021
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[17308]
Abstract: Solid/gas Single–Crystal to Single–Crystal (SC–SC) hydrogenation of appropriate diene precursors forms the corresponding σ–alkane complexes [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)nPCy2)(L)][BArF4] (n = 3, 4) and [RhH(Cy2P(CH2)2(CH)(CH2)2PCy2)(L)][BArF4] (n = 5, L = norbornane, NBA; cyclooctane, COA). Their struc-tures, as determined by single–crystal X-ray diffraction, have cations exhibiting Rh···H–C σ–interactions which are modulated by both the chelating ligand and the identity of the alkane, while all sit in an octahedral anion–microenvironment. These range from chelating η2,η2 Rh···H–C (e.g. [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)nPCy2)(η2η2–NBA)][BArF4], n = 3 and 4), through to more weakly bound η1 Rh··H–C in which C–H activation of the chelate backbone has also occurred (e.g. [RhH(Cy2P(CH2)2(CH)(CH2)2PCy2)(η1–COA)][BArF4]) and ultimately to systems where the alkane is not ligated with the metal center, but sits encapsulated in the supporting anion microenvironment – [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)3PCy2)][COA⊂BArF4] – in which the metal center instead forms two intramolecular agostic η1 Rh···H–C interactions with the phosphine cyclohexyl groups. CH2Cl2 adducts formed by displacement of the η1–alkanes in solution (n = 5; L = NBA, COA), [RhH(Cy2P(CH2)2(CH)(CH2)2PCy2)(η1–ClCH2Cl)][BArF4], are characterized crystallographically. Analyses via periodic DFT, QTAIM, NBO and NCI calculations, alongside variable temperature solid–state NMR spectroscopy, provide snapshots marking the onset of Rh σ-alkane interactions along a C···H activation trajectory. These are negligible in [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)3PCy2)][COA⊂BArF4]; in [RhH(Cy2P(CH2)2(CH)(CH2)2PCy2)(η1–COA)][BArF4] σC–H→Rh σ-donation is supported by Rh→σ*C-H ‘pregostic’ donation; and in [Rh(Cy2P(CH2)nPCy2)(η2η2-NBA)][BArF4] (n = 2-4) σ-donation dominates, supported by classical Rh(dπ)→σ*C-H π-back donation. Dispersive interactions with the [BArF4]- anions and Cy substituents further stabilize the alkanes within the binding pocket.
|
Oct 2018
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Alexios
Grigoropoulos
,
George
Whitehead
,
Noemie
Perret
,
Alexandros
Katsoulidis
,
Mark
Chadwick
,
Robert
Davies
,
Anthony
Haynes
,
Lee
Brammer
,
Andrew
Weller
,
Jianliang
Xiao
,
Matthew
Rosseinsky
Open Access
Abstract: Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are porous crystalline materials that have emerged as promising hosts for the heterogenization of homogeneous organometallic catalysts, forming hybrid materials which combine the benefits of both classes of catalysts. Herein, we report the encapsulation of the organometallic cationic Lewis acidic catalyst [CpFe(CO)2(L)]+ ([Fp-L]+, Cp = η5-C5H5, L = weakly bound solvent) inside the pores of the anionic [Et4N]3[In3(BTC)4] MOF (H3BTC = benzenetricarboxylic acid) via a direct one-step cation exchange process. To conclusively validate this methodology, initially [Cp2Co]+ was used as an inert spatial probe to (i) test the stability of the selected host; (ii) monitor the stoichiometry of the cation exchange process and (iii) assess pore dimensions, spatial location of the cationic species and guest-accessible space by single crystal X-ray crystallography. Subsequently, the isosteric [Fp-L]+ was encapsulated inside the pores via partial cation exchange to form [(Fp-L)0.6(Et4N)2.4][In3(BTC)4]. The latter was rigorously characterized and benchmarked as a heterogeneous catalyst in a simple Diels-Alder reaction, thus verifying the cationic organometallic molecular catalyst’s integrity and reactivity after cation exchange. These results provide a platform for the development of heterogeneous catalysts with chemically and spatially well-defined catalytic sites by one-step cation exchange into MOFs.
|
Dec 2015
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[1858]
Abstract: Transition metal–alkane complexes—termed σ-complexes because the alkane donates electron density to the metal from a σ-symmetry carbon–hydrogen (C–H) orbital—are key intermediates in catalytic C–H activation processes, yet these complexes remain tantalizingly elusive to characterization in the solid state by single-crystal x-ray diffraction techniques. Here, we report an approach to the synthesis and characterization of transition metal–alkane complexes in the solid state by a simple gas-solid reaction to produce an alkane σ-complex directly. This strategy enables the structural determination, by x-ray diffraction, of an alkane (norbornane) σ-bound to a d8–rhodium(I) metal center, in which the chelating alkane ligand is coordinated to the pseudosquare planar metal center through two σ-C–H bonds.
|
Sep 2012
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Abstract: A Rh(I)-catalyzed method for the efficient functionalization of arenes is reported. Aryl methyl sulfides are combined with terminal alkynes to deliver products of carbothiolation. The overall process results in reincorporation of the original arene functional group, a methyl sulfide, into the products as an alkenyl sulfide. The carbothiolation process can be combined with an initial Rh(I)-catalyzed alkene or alkyne hydroacylation reaction in three-component cascade sequences. The utility of the alkenyl sulfide products is also demonstrated in simple carbo- and heterocycle-forming processes. We also provide mechanistic evidence for the course of this new process.
|
Feb 2012
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Diamond Proposal Number(s):
[1885]
Abstract: We report the first insertion step at a metal center for the catalytic dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 to form the simplest oligomeric species, H3B·NMeHBH2·NMeH2, by the addition of 1 equiv of H3B·NMeH2 to [Ir(PCy3)2(H)2(η2-H3B·NMeH2)][BArF4] to give [Ir(PCy3)2(H)2(η2-H3B·NMeHBH2·NMeH2)][BArF4]. This reaction is also catalytic for the formation of the free linear diborazane, but this is best obtained by an alternative stoichiometric synthesis.
|
Jun 2011
|
|
I19-Small Molecule Single Crystal Diffraction
|
Abstract: It's all in the ligand: By choice of the appropriate diphosphine ligand a previously linear-selective alkyne hydroacylation process can be "switched" to be highly branched-selective (see scheme). Structural data for the ortho-iPr-dppe-rhodium catalyst suggest restricted rotation of the phosphine aryl units may be responsible for the observed selectivity.
|
Apr 2011
|
|
